Level 2: Involved in GMO campaigns along with other advocacy causesĢ016: $20000 received from Columbus Foundation, TheĢ016: $115000 received from Compton Foundation, Inc.Ģ016: $50000 received from American Express FoundationĢ016: $1600000 received from David and Lucile Packard FoundationĢ016: $90000 received from Garfield FoundationĢ016: $50000 received from Greater Kansas City Community FoundationĢ016: $529709 received from John D. Level 3*: No specific GMO campaign activity, but general supportĢ016: $3005000 donated to Center for Biological DiversityĢ016: $850000 donated to Dogwood AllianceĢ016: $2000000 donated to Environmental Working GroupĢ016: $5000000 donated to Friends of the EarthĢ016: $13085000 donated to Natural Resources Defense CouncilĢ016: $500000 donated to Rainforest Action NetworkĢ015: $2600000 donated to Environmental Working GroupĢ015: $7055000 donated to Natural Resources Defense CouncilĢ015: $9500000 donated to Sierra Club FoundationĢ014: $18000500 donated to Natural Resources Defense CouncilĢ014: $10009000 donated to Sierra Club Foundation Note, these are just illustrations, to give you an idea of what you will find in the network map. The right graphic shows all donations to Friends of the Earth, one of the most aggressive anti-GMO NGOs. The graphic on the left shows all donations from 2012-2016 from the Foundation for the Carolinas, one of the top 10 contributors to organizations that oppose the use of agricultural biotechnology, including GMOs and gene-edited crops and animals. RECIPIENT NONPROFITS, such as Friends of the Earth, US Right to Know and Sierra Clubīelow are two examples in simplified form of how our network maps look-you can explore the actual maps when you dive into the visualizations.DONOR FOUNDATIONS, such as Schmidt Family Foundation, Tides and Bloomberg.The interactive network maps are composed of two major categories: The impact of the financial relationships that fund the anti-GMO movement can be displayed in both list form and in network maps-we provide the data in both forms.
During that period (2016 is the last year for which complete data are available), foundations donated almost $1 billion to advocacy groups committed in whole or in part to presenting inaccurate information about agricultural biotechnology. We focused on the years 2012-2016, when anti- GMO advocacy was most intense as campaigning groups promoted bans of transgenic crops and lobbied for strict labeling. In a commitment to transparency, we’ve mined a trove of data to help the public understand the funding network that supports the anti-biotechnology industry.
0 kommentar(er)
